The Supreme court explained in what ways motorists can confirm payment of state duty in the traffic police (by check or payment system)

Electronic or paper: to confirm the payment of state duty in the traffic police can be different

If you have any problems with the driver’s license exchange because of the inability to confirm payment of state duty in the traffic police, the Supreme court decision will help you to solve the problem. As with the similar case was tried the Supreme court, and the order of the interior Ministry will make the appropriate changes.

The problem

Initiated validation of the regulations of the Ministry of interior for permits were made by a citizen who filed a Supreme court appeal, due to the fact that she is not accepted in the police as proof of state fee payment receipt and the payment order in exchange of WU.

The simplest operation that is carried out daily by thousands of motorists across the country have led to unexpected results, writes “Kommersant”: “the inspector failed to find in the state information system on state and municipal payments (GIS GMP of the Federal Treasury) information about the payment”.

This was followed by legal, again rightful rejection of complete offer public services on the basis of paragraph 24 of the regulations for examinations and the issuance of rights, MIA order No. 995 (24. The payment of the state fee payer confirmed information certifying payment of the state fee contained in the State information system on state and municipal payments).

And at that time, until the payment went to the state information system on state and municipal payments (GIS GMP), that is, official confirmation of payment of 2 thousand rubles was not, such evidence as the receipt or bills without stamps and signatures could not be accepted by employees of the structure.

In the end, the woman still brought the required payment order, certified by all the rules, though in that moment, when the “payment information appeared in the GIS GMP, the incident was closed and the services were provided,” according to the website kommersant.ru.

Still in the Supreme court

People with a stable citizenship differ from other citizens that are relentless to achieve their goals, even when their plan will not bring them any serious dividends, but only moral satisfaction from the fact that someone else will not fall into the legal trap in which they were.

Perhaps this desire explains the fact that the citizen despite the solved problem is still filed a complaint with the Supreme court to recognize out-of-law clause 24 of the order of MIA No. 995, and to regulate the procedure of verification of payment of the registration fee in accordance with the law “On organization of rendering state and municipal services”.

And truth the motorist has achieved (albeit partially, but more on that below) and now we with you will be much easier (most likely it will be that way) to obtain and renew their driver’s license.

Proceedings in the armed forces and the decision

The Ministry of justice acknowledged that the regulations of the Ministry of interior does not match the Tax code, which States that the payment of the registration fee is confirmed not only with information from the GIS GMP, but the payment order with a mark of Bank or receipt of “prescribed form”.

The participants of the proceedings, in particular the representative of the Prosecutor General offered to satisfy the claim partially. The court supported the idea, “…pointing out that the Tax code has greater legal force than the administrative regulation of the Ministry of internal Affairs. Contradictions with the law “On organization of rendering state and municipal services” the armed forces are not found, the conclusions of Mrs. … “based on an incorrect interpretation of substantive law”, said in the decision,” noted on the website “Kommersant”.

However, since the entry decision of the armed forces in force clause 24 of the regulations of the Ministry of interior will not operate. The interior Ministry will conduct a review of the results of the case and likely will make changes to the order at number 995.

Thus, if the GIS GMP “zaglyuchit”, but as practice shows it can happen, you can always play it safe, referring to standard paper documents.